Tuesday, 5 August 2014

The Twists Of Love - Hal (Haru)

Like any of my posts, this is an analysis, not a review. I would thus recommend that you watch the animation before you read this post, because it will have spoilers galore.

Hal is a recently released movie that, like Time of Eve and Chobits, deals with robotic and human love, however it is a bit different. A robot named Q01 is asked to be transformed into a boy named Hal after the real Hal died in a plane crash. The robot is asked to do so in order to coax Kurumi, Hal's now ex-girlfriend, out her depression where she would not eat or even cry. The film starts off with robot Hal just trying to get Kurumi out of her solitude through fulfilling her wishes she had left behind on a Rubik's cube. As the robot Hal does this he is able to get closer and closer to Kurumi and she opens up more and more with Hal about what happened between her and the real Hal before the aeroplane accident. Just as things are getting better they also get more complicated as robot Hal runs into one of Hal's old friends, Ryu, who seemingly is oblivious to the fact he died. The robot also starts to assume Hal's place as Kurumi's lover, blurring the line between itself and the original Hal. Consquently the robot Hal tried to find out more about the past Hal and his relationship with Kurumi. It finds out about how Hal was forced in a gang, along with Ryu, and this made his personality overly pragmatic when it came to money and valuing things. This all comes to a head when the robot Hal invites Kurumi to a festival dressed in the dead Hal's kimono. Kurumi shares her memories and the two apologise to each other, and thus reconcile. Kurumi goes to the festival and two seem like a typical couple. However after the festival Ryu shows up again telling Hal he is still part of the group and talking as if he has made some arrangements with the group before even meeting Kurumi. Hal and Kurumi thus run away and manage to evade Ryu and his gang until a stair breaks under Kurumi and she falls into a stream. Hal goes to rescue her and is tackled by Ryu who confronts him on the whole situation. He reveals it was in fact Kurumi who died on the plane, that Hal was the one who went into a zombie like state and thought he was a robot, and that this Kurumi is not real. Bleeding Hal looks over to Kurumi, whose wounds show she is a robot, for confirmation. She manages to jump into the river below and is soon followed by Hal where he learns to accept all that has been revealed to him. We get a flashback of the doctor telling Q01 he needs to save Hal. He makes peace with this and says how he would not change a thing because his relationship was so good it was worth the heartache the accident caused him. 



The robot Hal used the old rubik’s cubes to get Kurumi out of her shell: http://yue-ki.deviantart.com/art/loved-ones-456055461

When I finished the movie I asked myself one question. What makes this or any twist in a movie successful? Obviously this twist is great because it creates a total role reversal. Hal is no longer the robot; he is the depressed one who must come out of some zombie like state. Not only that but we thought we knew about Kurumi and her motivations. But what creates a successful twist? I think it has to do with perspective and what we assume to be real with the premise of the film. This film totally films the first premise, that Kurumi is the one in need of treatment. Also, in terms of perspective, the main character (Hal in this case) must also believe and accept the premise and work on this basis. Hal assumes he is the robot helping the reclusive patient and he works off of this premise to help her. He often asks question to the doctor, who supposedly turned Q01 into Hal, about his task, about what it is like to love (as he is an “emotionless” robot), and about the old Hal. It shows he believes the shows premise and that we as an audience should do so too. Furthermore, Kurumi (who is really the robot, but whose thoughts we never really hear) refers to Hal as a robot, both in speech and in notes. So does the doctor who helps Hal with his task, but is really the one who came up with the idea of the treatment. Having the main character believe and act a way that assumes the premise of the film is right, when it will turn out to be wrong is how to set up a twist properly it seems.
Hal and Kurumi were completely reversed with the twist: http://www.zerochan.net/1703630#full
There are points (or maybe hints) at which a twist could be guessed at, but it is easy enough to explain them away. The first of these is when Ryu, one of Hal’s old friends turns up and says they should catch up, before running off from the police. Why doesn’t Ryu know Hal is dead? Maybe he just never found out. It creates an interesting dilemma for the premise of the story, and testing the foundations of the film creates the mystery and suspense to keep the audience engaged. A film must also have these sort of hints because this hint (or rather character) should return and be used as the vehicle to overturn the wrong premises. So when Ryu returns the conflict that will reveal the twist starts. Ryu talks as if he and Hal have some understanding beyond the knowledge of Kurumi about their past life. He talks as if Hal got into a relationship in the first place for some notorious reason planned by Ryu. This conversation is beyond both Hal and the audience until the twist is revealed at last, when Hal is truly confronted by Ryu (bleeding rather than breaking like a machine) and then realises and makes peace with the fact that Kurumi is dead and her part has been played by Q01. The twist is wonderfully executed.

Ryu was the cause of the twist and this actually caused the perception of his character to change too.
Not only is the twist of the film implemented very well but the consequences it has on parts other than the story itself is what make it truly great. Hal started of as a look into the human mind from an outside perspective. The “robot” Hal did not know what priceless was meant and after learning about it apologises for the mistakes the past Hal made about the buttons (and how they were priceless). In particular it explores the idea of what love is and how to love someone. The robot asks the doctor about love and what part empathy plays in it, feeling if he cannot feel it he cannot get Kurumi out of her shell. The robot Hal uses the wishes on the Rubik’s cubes to show his “love”. However, this whole robotic love intensifies as the robot Hal rather easily assumes the role of Hal, whilst at the same time thinking he is not Hal. Does he not realize this person died or something? It seems very much in bad taste but on the other hand he is a robot who perhaps doesn’t know about human thought (he didn’t know about priceless precious things) and maybe he sees this as a way to get Kurumi to come out. This is most vividly done when he wears Hal’s kimono and instead of understandably freaking out Kurumi it encourages her to open up to the fight she and Hal had before the accident. Of course this leads into apologies from both Hal and Kurumi over their button fight and the “robot” Hal is very comforting to her. They then to go to the Gion Festival together and it seems as though both are human. The audiences assumes they will reach a conclusion about love and what it will really mean for the robot after he successfully completes his task.
After the festival I thought we would get some conclusion on how to love someone or on robotic love: http://www.zerochan.net/1703629#full
However, the twist not only changes the characters and the story it also changes the message of love the film portrays. We do not leave with a conclusion about robotic love. Instead we get a message of how worthwhile love is. Hal, in reconciling with Kurumi (or rather the robot Q01), thinks over the position he now finds himself in and what he has experienced both after the accident and before it. He accepts Kurumi is gone and cannot bring her back. However, he does not relapse into his old state that he assumed after the accident happened. The robotic therapy worked. He acknowledges the loss and hurt he has suffered and in making peace with he says that he would not change anything. He would not take back the love he had with Kurumi in order to stop his heartache, as the good undeniable outweighed the bad. He basically comes to the same conclusion Tennyson: “tis better to have loved and los than never to have loved at all”. We cannot make assumptions about robotic love as Hal was never truly a robot. The way he felt about Kurumi and expressed it in the events that surround and follow their apologies could just be because his actions towards Kurumi, who is really a robot but he doesn’t know this, are just part of his human, emotion-based decision making rather than some robotic calculation-based. Likewise we can’t make any conclusions about Kurumi as she never has dialogue (that we see) with anyone other than Hal and never seemingly muses about feeling love. She, for all we could know, just be playing the role as a brilliant actor. Everything Kurumi has done in the film becomes a mystery with the character reversal and thus we can’t really use her to expound any ideas or messages. I mean yes it still does question what constitutes real love. It provides the answer that working towards understanding one another is key but everything in Hal’s journey to find this out is a little undermined when we learn the one he is seducing is just a robot, not a real human.mthe message changes from discovery to memory in a nice paradox. 
Hal and Kurumi were a good couple and Hal cherished her despite his loss:http://www.zerochan.net/1478893#full
I started off this film interested by the premise, looking how androids would be portrayed and how robotic love would be tackled by the creators of this film. It started off this way but the twist changed this into a message about the value of love, and the loss of love. I thought the story was pretty interesting and the twist in particular, was well done. It used the main characters’ ignorance to support the premise and supporting characters’ roles as therapists to further affirm the premise to the main character and the audience as well. As a result I thought it was interesting to analyse this film around this plot twist and I hope you have enjoyed the read.
 A nice sketch of Hal and Kurumi: http://jtmaster13.deviantart.com/art/Hal-469274325

Links:



Friday, 1 August 2014

The Film That Sank A Studio – Titan AE, The Borrower Arrietty and When Marnie Was There

A few nights ago I watched a movie that is now a cult film: Titan AE. This is a sci-fi animated film from 2000 directed by Don Bluth and Gary Goldman. It was about Humans invent some new revolution technology called the Titan Project and out of fear a race named the Drej attack Earth, destroying it. The story is one of a now grown boy, the son of the man who created the Titan Project, must now find his father’s lost invention in order to reunited and save humanity from extinction. However, what is really notable about this film is how it made a massive loss at the box office and was thus blamed for sinking an entire animation studio. After their hit Anastasia Fox Animation Studios looked to rival Disney animations. Anastasia was in essence a film very similar to many of the Disney princess movies and did well both commercially and critically. However, in 2000 the studio released its next feature film (Titan AE) and based on its box office failure compared to its budget the studio closed. This was after laying off 300 of the 380 staff (in order to cut expenses and make cheaper films) before the film’s release.


Titan AE poster, which looks like an action packed Sci-Fi. http://www.deviantart.com/art/Titan-A-E-344682317

 

Having watched the movie I thought it was not that bad. It had some moments of promise like the part of the ships in the ice ring that created a mirror room like place. It also had some clichéd moments, such as the young adult given the wheel and when he is driving he is followed by dolphin like creatures. The characters were likewise archetypal, or clichéd, with the reluctant at first hero, the girl who hates him initially and then loves him after a troubling experience together, and the backstabbing comrade who redeems himself at the end. However, admittedly the characterizations are done too quickly and changes aren’t given enough depth. The universe it created was though rather interesting and well made, with most parts of it having a purpose to the story. It had perhaps an interesting message about something that is really important to humans: the earth and all the wildlife and how this cannot be replicated once it is lost. It’s visuals are maybe not as good as Pixar’s Toy Story, released a few years earlier and its soundtrack is a polarizing rock based score. It wasn’t necessarily a bad film but it wasn’t as good as say Treasure Planet, the Disney Sci-Fi animated adventure released two years later. However, these two are really on the only two western Sci-Fi animated adventure films around this time.  

 

Treasure Planet poster, where we can see more kid friendly elements, like the typical non-verbal small companion. http://movie.southlinkbd.com/images/Treasure%20Planet.jpg

 

The directors were experienced (Don Bluth and Gary Goldman had worked for Disney and had made things like The Secret of NIMH and The Land Before Time previously) and the cast were pretty star-studded, with Matt Damon taking the lead role of Cale. So why did the studio go shut down if the movie was not that bad? Surely such good directors and good cast could bring in crowds. Why did people not see it if it was such a unique film? Well precisely because it was so special and novel a film for the western market. Western films are usually about princesses (Disney), about some non-human that goes through an adventure (Pixar) or competing with the localized Ghibli fantasy movies. There is little room for a sci-fi adventure. However, because it is so unique and different it became hard for the studio to market it. The main reason given for the movie’s failure was the marketing and failing to aim for a target audience. It was not as child friendly as other movies like the Disney, Pixar and Ghibli films. At the end of the film, without giving too much a way, there is a scene where a man breaks a humanoid alien’s neck in full focus of the shot. A bug alien is shot and vaporized is one thing, a twisting neck snap is another. On the other hand it was supposedly not marketed for the sci-fi Star Wars type audience. Because no one audience was targeted, no one went, the film flopped and the studio ended up closing.

 

Preed was the character that had his neck snapped. Even though he wasn’t a human his death is definitely to mature for a child’s animation. http://www.deviantart.com/art/Preed-About-To-Leave-217739180

 

The reason I brought this all up is because recently news has surfaced of rumours and interviews suggesting Ghibli will practically close if When Marnie Was There fails. It will stop making movies, because it is not making money this way, but it will just keep on a few employees to manage their copyrights and trademarks. I can imagine that this would be quite profitable seeing as how much merchandise Ghibli sells of characters like Totoro, Jiji (Kiki’s cat) and Ponyo or just books, posters, calendars, puzzles etc of its most famous films. There are various museum exhibits people would pay to see that it could make. Not to mention that last year Princess Mononoke was adapted for stage and I could imagine Chihiro and Howl getting the same treatment. In other words, it seems unless Ghibli can keep making decent money on its new projects, it will stop trying so and just focus on making money more efficiently through its old ones. 

 

Ghibli certainly has a lot of merchandise.

 

But why is Ghibli not making money on its projects? Are its films not that good anymore? First, its visuals are as good as they have been and they still make the most beautiful 2D animations around (soon maybe the only 2D animated features around). Likewise the stories, characters, soundtracks are still very solid and are in fact good. So why are they failing. Well I think its sort of the same reason as Titan AE failed, failure to target a market audience or rather, in Ghibli’s case because it has got its own audience, a failure to deliver on the film genre it is most famous for. Just as Titan AE delivered a Sci-Fi adventure, not really for kids, Ghibli has been producing (and it seems When Marnie Was There is the same way) historical drama/romance films, that aren’t really for kids and aren’t the fantasy adventures of old. We should establish what Ghibli’s genre is. Nausicaa, Totoro, Porco Rosso and Kiki established the Ghibli genre of an adventure through a sort of (but not necessarily entirely) fantasy world in the late 1980s and early 1990s. Ghibli movies then usually followed in these footsteps. Admittedly this is more Miyazaki than Ghibli, as he then made Mononoke, Chihiro, Howl and Ponyo and Takahato did not really follow this making his own things, from Grave of the Fireflies to my Neighbours the Yamadas, from Pom Poko to A Whisper of the Heart. However, Miyazaki made a few more films than Takahata and other films still followed Miyazaki’s concepts. The Cat Returns and Tales from Earthsea both looked to create fantasy adventures. These two films were not made by Miyazaki or Takahata, but by potentially the new generation of Ghibli

 

Studio Ghibli established really itself in the fantasy genre. http://www.deviantart.com/art/Ghibli-398165032

 

But now we get to a point where these rumors surfaced for the first time it seemed. Before the studio released Arrietty it said it would close if the film did poorly. Miyazaki said that if Arrietty did well he had plans for a Porco Rosso sequel (many speculate this became As The Wind Rises). However, he said that if the movie failed that Suzuki, who was the general manager had a dissolution plan and would just focus on trademarks and copyrights. That being said Arrietty did very well in the box office, making $145million US and thus the studio continued to make movies. Who knows why exactly they would stop making movies, especially when Ponyo did well at the box office, as did Tales from Earthsea before it. One rumour I read was that they were not necessarily talking about doing well financially, but doing well critically. Miyazaki and Takahata were old and they had already failed n their plans of succession with Yoshifumi Kondō, as he died in 1998 from a stress related illness (this caused Miyazaki to think of retiring or at least work at a more relaxed pace). Arrietty was well received critically as well, however, it was probably a tester because this was Hiromasa Yonebayashi’s directorial debut. He along with Hayao Miyazaki’s son, Goro Miyazaki, were to become the new generation of Ghibli, the new Miyazaki and Takahata it seems. Unfortunately, Goro’s first film, Tales from Earthsea, did not do well critically. It was not as well received as other Ghibli films. At the same time as being nominated for good awards, it won Raspberry awards, for both worst film of the year and worst director. Maybe Ghibli executives were scared the new generation would run the Studio name through the mud if they let it go on too far. I mean these are the same executives who stopped Mamoru Hosoda directing the Howl’s Moving Castle because they did not like the direction. Mamoru Hosoda has subsequently gone onto direct The Girl Who Leapt Through Time, Summer Wars and The Wolf Children. He is definitely talented but maybe the old guard was scared of change. This fear could have been confirmed when Goro Miyazaki’s film was obviously not well received when the board gave him the project instead of waiting for Hayao Miyazaki to finish Howl. If Hiromasa Yonebayashi failed the test as well the board probably would have realized that it might be best to just shut up shop.

 

The Borrower Arrietty did very well for Ghibli, both commercially and critically. http://www.deviantart.com/art/Arrietty-199686380

 

Anyway now the same situation is happening. Studio Ghibli’s future productions lie in the hands of Hiromasa Yonebayashi; the outcome of his film When Marnie Was There is to be the production that decides the fate of the studio. If it fails then the studio would stop making new films and focus on capitalizing on its old projects. Many, however, are surer that this is not critically based but a financially based decision. I suppose we should ask why Ghibli films are so expensive. This is because unlike other studios that outsource a lot of their animation to other parts of the world, like South Korea, where it is cheaper, Studio Ghibli has a full time team of animators in Japan. Supposedly, according to Kotaku, now Ghibli films need to make $100million US to turn a profit. Anything less would obviously be a loss. Who knows how much this has to do with the financial crisis caused by the economic collapse in 2008 and then the impact from the 2011 Tohoku earthquake and tsunami. I am no economist but I all I can see that it seems that Ghibli films cost a lot more and need to make money now, more so than the past. But then why aren’t the films making money? Surely, Miyazaki’s and Takahata’s films made a fair buck, right? Their films are still top quality, why aren’t people seeing them. Well the same reason people didn’t see Titan AE. Quality and directorial names sometimes aren’t enough. Sometimes, total uniqueness isn’t what audiences want, they want the same but different.

 

The Legend of Korra is an example of a high-quality animation that was exported to South Korea.

 

As I said before, Ghibli established itself as a studio that made films within a partial or totally fantasy world and usually its stories were about adventure and growth. Arrietty followed in these footsteps and it paid dividends. However, the films that have followed have not been so wise. From Up On Poppy Hill was Goro Miyazaki’s next film and although it was good, it felt too much like an underdeveloped romantic drama that belonged on TV if it had more filler. It was a historical romantic drama that had none of the fantasy elements Ghibli is beloved for. Likewise Hayao Miyazaki’s latest film is also devoid of any fantasy elements as it too is squarely in the romance/drama sections of movies. I said with Disney and Pixar, people go to these films expecting something and come out disappointed if it doesn’t reach the target audience. Maybe the same is for Ghibli films now, that they (like Titan AE) are not necessarily hitting a target audience, in that they are maybe too mature with not enough fantasy for kids (their target audience), but don’t push the drama and emotional boundaries for the new audience that they could bring in. The other film within this is Takahata’s Tale of the Bamboo Cutter which has been a box office flop it seems, losing all (and maybe more) that Miyazaki’s film brought in and realistically the only reason Miyazaki’s film made money is that it was riding the reports that he would be retiring (for real). Takahata’s films, to be honest, are just too unique and different to be box office hits really. This is especially the case for his latest film.

 

The animals Ghibli has produced only show how fantastical their worlds are. http://www.deviantart.com/art/Ghibli-Naptime-463250108

 

So again it’s all up to Yonebayashi. It seems as if he made a film good enough for critics last year, lets see if he can make one good enough for the box office this year. The signs don’t look so far with it failing to do half as good as Arrietty in its first week according to Crunchroll. Having had a look at trailers it’s no surprise why this is happening. Although it has that Ghibli look it is again missing that Ghibli touch of fantasy, that thing that sparks a child’s imagination and makes them want their parents to take them to it. Again however, it is getting good reviews but it, like Ghibli’s other latest films, seems to be failing to captivate a target audience, or rather the established audience. It's not just Arrietty that did better than the newest Ghibli film, the Pokemon movies also did very well. Again maybe because they have a target audience and they stick to that audience. Their films aren't as good as Ghibli films but they sell because of their audience. I hope When Marnie Was There does well however. I hope the rumours are untrue and Ghibli continues to make quality films, no matter the subject matter, but for the sake of continuing maybe they just have to stick to fantasy.

 

When Marnie Was There just looks (from its poster that is meant to sell it to audiences) like a romantic drama again. 

                                                                  

 

Links:

 

About Fox Animation Studios shutting down.

 

http://www.ign.com/articles/2000/06/27/fox-animation-studios-closes-its-doors

 

http://articles.latimes.com/2000/jun/29/business/fi-45965

 

Earthsea’s “Worst of” Awards

 

http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/news/2007-01-25/earthsea-wins-rasperry-award

 

Ghibli “closing” in 2010 and Arrietty’s box office total.

 

http://www.themarysue.com/studio-ghibli-closing/

 

http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=arrietty.htm

 

Ghibli “closing” in 2014 and how When Marnie Was There is doing poorly:

 

http://kotaku.com/studio-ghibli-might-quit-making-feature-films-says-rep-1608198259

 

http://www.crunchyroll.com/anime-news/2014/07/22-1/studio-ghiblis-latest-film-marnie-earns-less-than-half-of-arrietty-in-1st-weekend


http://www.filmbiz.asia/news/pokemon-defeats-ghibli-at-japan-box-office

Monday, 28 July 2014

How Much Is Too Much? - Dragon Ball Z Movie 14: Battle Of Gods.

Dragon Ball Z is seemingly the godfather of modern Shounen animes, at least in terms of ones that have been localised for Western audience. It is, for many, the ultimate animation when they were growing up. If you watched it you were in the majority, not the minority (in my surrounding anyway). I am sure everyone who watched it wantedd Goku's powers and probably tried to do kamehameha in a number of private situations. It had such awesome enemies, Freiza, Cell and Buu, and such admirable heroes, Goku, Gohan, Trunks, Vegeta and Piccolo. Nowadays it is sort of a cultural touchstone, with numerous memes showing its importance to the internet generation ("over 9000", "this isn't even my final form"). All that being said when I look at Dragon Ball Z objectively I must ask whether or not the creators of the series went too far. Having recently watched the newest novel instalment to the anime (not DBKai), the 14th Movie: Battle of Gods, I really asked myself this question after seeing the new incarnation that Goku turned into, the Super Saiyan God. I definitely do think the creators have gone overboard with this and the more I think back over the series, and especially the movies, I think more and more that the series went a touch over the top, especially when we consider the "power" that Freiza, or even Vegeta (as an antagonist at one time), had. So the question becomes when did it get too much? 


DBZ has such an immersive universe: http://www.zerochan.net/1741295#full


First, when I try to recall the whole journey I feel like DBZ had a few too many unnecessary enemies and story arcs. So we should try to narrow these down. When is it time to end an enemy? Did Broly really need to return twice? I really disliked Bio-Broly as a movie, the other two were acceptable as Broly was Broly, the legendary Super-Saiyan, not some pile of goo. Likewise, is Cooler's return as a regenerating robot thing really acceptable when Freiza's return was so lacklustre? Or when is it right that an enemy is just created used ideas that other enemies had? Super Android 13's ultimate form is somewhat like Cell's rise to Perfect Form and did not feel satisfying. One of the problems with DBZ and Sounen anime in general (in the case of not overdoing it) is having good, well thought out enemies that can reasonable fit into previous canon. I would accept Broly, because he was kick-ass and because he fits into the whole prophecy about Freiza being defeated by a Super Saiyan, but when he is turned into goo it just gets a tad silly. Buu could reasonably rejected as he is a fighter of legend but no one mentions him in previous arcs before he turns up. Likewise Cooler is not mentioned by Freiza or King Cold. However, I would say these backstories need to be well fit into the canon. Bojack, Super Android 13 and Cooler just seemed to be tacked onto the main series. Bojack (rather conveniently) is released when Cell destroys King Kai's planet, Super Android 13 is just another Android with the same sort of powers and Cooler is just the unmentioned brother of Freiza. All these enemies just feel tacked onto the main story as lame excuses to have more fights and make more money rather than say Broly, who was more intricately worked into the main storyline. 


BioBroly, for me, was one of those unnecessary enemies. He just seemed like a way to cash in on the Broly name. 
http://th05.deviantart.net/fs70/PRE/i/2013/247/5/a/bio_broly_by_leorine-d6l09oh.png

These are only the memorable enemies though, other ones I would take out, purely as unmemorable: Garlic Jr (from Dead Zone and the main series after Freiza but before Cell), Dr Wheelo (from the World's Strongest), Lord Slug (from the movie of the same name) and really any movie enemy before Cooler (so the guys from the Tree of Might too). This is purely because they felt (and looked) more like Dragonball enemies, rather than Dragon Ball Z enemies. When I think of DBZ I think of DragonBall I think more of Earth based enemies. I suppose everyone has a different opinion on who is a worthy villian and who is not, but my pickings are very slim I suppose in hindsight. However, there are other issues that DBZ has not to do with the just amount and varying quality of its various antagonists. Another big issue this anime has (because of the numerous every stronger enemies it must use to keep the series going) is the forms that the protagonists must take. 


These forms the protagonists must take, like the backstories of returning and new enemies, get more and more farfetched as the enemies get better and better. Saiyans, as the protagonists of the series, got more forms that were stronger and stronger in order to deal with these more powerful villains. Throughout DragonBall and the start of DBZ there is the Great Ape, but this is acceptable, Saiyans are aliens after all, so I do not have a problem with this. Nor do I have a problem with the idea of a Super Saiyan, as in order to beat Freiza, the ultimate evil, Goku had to become this, so it is again acceptable. What I don’t really accept is how many forms and tricks a Saiyan has beyond this. I admit I do like the idea of the Ascended Super Saiyan, where is it not another form but Saiyans just pushing themselves and their limits. This results in the speed vs raw power question which was cool to see. However, when Super Saiyans have other levels it really just gets a bit silly. With SSJ3 and SSJ4 (in DBGT) it kind of gets farcical. Most of all I was motivated to make this sort of post after seeing what I thought was the most ridiculous thing ever: the Super Saiyan God. I mean fusing was perhaps a cool way to make a more powerful fighter but when they can turn into a God, it gets a bit over the top. I mean it was like they couldn't make SSJ5 for DBZ because it only happens in DBGT and this would break the universe so that made the Super Saiyan God. It was definitely way over the line, for me anyway.


The real problem when we get down to it with the different forms for our heroes is not believability. These are aliens who can do strange things and basically have superpowers. All believability in terms of our reality is thrown out the window. Plausibility within an established universe is what I am talking about. Yes one form of Super Saiyan is definitely plausible, because there were legends, ones that other characters (namely Freiza) believed. However, the legends said that one had not come about for over a thousand years. The universe that had been established showed that being a Super Saiyan could be achieved but it was a very hard task. So due to how hard it is, is it really acceptable that those other than Goku can do it, and at such a young age in the case of Trunks and Goten? And is it really plausible that even when it was so hard to become a Super Saiyan that there are multiple unseen forms of it? I can accept within the universe that there is one form of Super Saiyan but not really two or more forms, or that anyone other than Goku and maybe Gohan could transform into it. Also it is believable that Namekians can fuse (they do it numerous times), but I don’t think Saiyans should be able to do so (this is more based on personal preference). Likewise I think it is plausible to have these omnipotent God characters (like in the newest movie) but I don’t think that Super Saiyans should be able to create one on the spot, no matter how mystical the ceremony may be. So in terms of forms I don’t find anything beyond Goku and Gohan really going beyond Ascended Super Saiyan as truly plausible within the universe. I mean if we look at Freiza’s, Cell’s and Buu’s various forms they are all given reasons. Freiza had to change many times to suppress his power, Cell got a new form as he absorbed the Androids and got closer to “perfection” and Buu got his new forms from just eating different opponents. The Super Saiyans forms are just them getting angrier and stronger really, not a great explanation to be honest.

Gotenks as the Super Saiyan God. Would this ever happen? http://fc03.deviantart.net/fs71/f/2011/236/8/1/gotenks_all_forms_by_mrgekon-d47p4r9.png

Just as the forms our heroes take to defeat increase and get more ridiculous so do the power levels for both heroes and enemies. Now power levels, or ki, didn’t have to be a thing for the DragonBall universe but they were established and measured with the scouters Raditz, Vegeta and all of Freiza’s minions had them. Originally ki levels did a good job of showing how much of an obstacle our heroes had to overcome and how much they had grown in strength. That being said as it goes on these get out of control as more and more enemies are established and these enemies must be more powerful than previous ones. Enemies must be stronger in order to keep the series interesting (obviously). This is alright, however as soon as there are numbers brought into things it starts getting difficult. Without numbers, everything gets a bit better as we don’t feel as much of a need to compare the relative strengths of everyone over the course of their journeys. At the start of the series, Goku had a power level of perhaps 1000 in the Saiyan saga (as he couldn’t beat the 1200 Raditz alone), is then calculated to have power level of 40,000,000 even without turning Super Saiyan. I know he learnt many new training techniques (such as training under high gravity) but could Goku really grow 40,000 times as strong?

Power levels are so established Sony used them to advertise how much more powerful the PS4 was than the PS3: http://www.junkiemonkeys.com/hilarious-dragon-ball-z-chart-explains-how-powerful-the-playstation-4-is/

Let’s take another example. Krillin during the Saiyan saga is just over 200 but is then calculated during some of the later movies to have a power of 3,000,000, if not more. Is it really plausible that someone could increase their strength by a multitude of fifteen thousand? I don’t really think so, even within a universe where you can create your own energy (I mean he is fully grown throughout it). I fully understand that the later power levels are pure speculation by fans and those who wish to rank and compare enemies. Yes they are not canon, at least (not beyond the Freiza saga) but when a universe establishes a set of rules, like ki levels being measurable by numbers, then it must be able to stick by those rules. However, in the case of DBZ, something had to give, as power levels, it seems, were too out of control and so these things should be considered beforehand. Before I wrap things up I would like to mention that One Piece, like DragonBall Z, gives its characters a number ranking (with bounties) but it is a bit more plausible. This is because, rather than being based solely on their power, it is based on what they have done and it is not grown by ten-thousand-fold.

Someone’s cool product design for scouters: http://www.deviantart.com/art/Scouter-Product-Display-200429685

In terms of story arcs, I would say that the destruction of Cell would be my limit. Although Cell was a great enemy (some might say the perfect one), his back story is very convulutated with the timetravel, Android absorbion and just creation in general was a little improbable. You might say this should eliminate Cell but I think Cell and the Androids. However, although he was Earth based, he was more of an evolution of a DragonBall character (with Dr. Gero and the Red Ribbon army) than say Garlic Jr was and so he seems acceptable. Likewise the story telling and characterisation within this arc seems good with it ending as Gohan unlocks his potential and takes over the role of his father, after Goku sacrifices himself. Also the build-up enemies (the Androids and Cell Jrs) do all have their place in the story and it all seems fine enough. Although the Super Sayian form of SSJ2 is a bit of a cop out I suppose I could live with it. Buu on the otherhand feels over the top. Although he is the most fearsome enemy in the universe, he is no mentioned beforehand. Cell cannot be mentioned beforehand because he was being created in a laboratory. Likewise, Buu's build-up enemies feel not so well worked into the plot (with the multifloored base of Babidi's hideout), and the many forms of Buu just feel tiresome after a while (as all he does is lose and then absorb the next Z warrior). Likewise the forms of the Z warriors start to feel overdone, as here is where fusion, Gohan's ultimate form and SSJ3 come into play. Also this story represents a passing of the torch from Goku to Gohan. Gohan has unlocked his hidden potential (not really if we include the Buu story) and is ready to protect the world. With the end of Buu yes we have Uub but he is a new character entirely so it seems out of the woodwork, like most things in the Buu arc. So I think Buu goes too far but Cell could be my limit.  


In terms of enemies Cell is really my limit. Buu’s arc is just too much: http://www.deviantart.com/art/Frieza-Cell-Wallpaper-182285869

However, this being said in short and to be honest anything beyond Freiza on Namek gets a bit farfetched really and he should have been the main antagonist, with Broly as an after series movie. This should have been the end of it. Freiza was seemingly the ultimate hill to overcome, the one who could only be beaten by the first Super Saiyan. This was it the ultimate end, when Goku ascended above all else who had tried and saved the Galaxy (not just the Earth). This is when the "Z" warriors became interplanetary heroes, not just ones for Earth. This is also the point at which Goku, the young boy we followed from Dragon Ball, became the best fighter in the universe. His journey and thus our story is over. When it comes to other aliens like Buu, (and from the movies) Bojack, Cooler, they don't feel as hyped up as Freiza and are thus easy to cast out. We never hear about them until they turn up but Freiza was sort of the ultimate boss of the Saiyans who invaded Earth. In terms of numbers (a problem that plagues long running Shounen) Freiza was a nice round seemingly unobtainable number of one million. Once we get beyond Freiza the numbers certainly blow out of portion, considering one of the most famous lines was "over 9000" (over 8000 in the Japanese original). The Freiza arc also answers many questions about the mysterious dragonballs themselves, which were not answered previously, such as where they were from. Admittedly there is no real redemption for Vegeta and thus no Trunks etc but it doesn’t matter as the story is over.

Freiza vs Goku should have definitely been the end of the series. http://www.deviantart.com/art/Dragon-Ball-Z-Freiza-Saga-320012596

Many think that Akira Toriyama originally intended to end the entire Dragonball story with the conclusion of the Freiza saga but because the series was so popular that he was more or less "forced" to work on it. This maybe true maybe just rumour I feel like I have laid out my reasons for this theory. In conclusion, for DBZ I think Freiza, with Broly (and perhaps the first Cooler) as an acceptable after series movie or two, should have been the end of the series. This being said I could accept Cell as well. But I think the latest movie with its "Super Sayian God" form just shows how seemingly farfetched DBZ, one of the most beloved series of all time, got before it ended. Series, like One Piece or Fairy Tail, need to end sometime and I think it is better to end it sooner than leave it hanging forever. Pokemon likewise feels this way. Arcs (movies or series based) begin to feel formulaic, the power "level" of enemies feels unnecessarily bloated compared to the early antagonists and only way to keep the heroes interesting is to beef up their powers with some more ridiculous form for them to take. Basically the problem is that as the world gets deeper and deeper it all gets less and less worthwhile as the feeling increasingly goes from one that thinks the story is progressing to one that it is stagnant and will never reach its goal. For me the best series end at the right time. 

I would have liked Broly as an after series movie though: 
http://www.zerochan.net/1741330

Tuesday, 22 July 2014

There is no Handbook for Being a Mother - The Wolf Children Ame and Yuki (Ookami Kodomo no Ame to Yuki)

Occasionally anime films come along that rival Studio Ghibli in both visuals and storytelling. One that definitely does this in recent years is Ookami Kodomo no Ame to Yuki. This translates to "Wolf Children Ame and Yuki". What the film's title promises is accurate, but this is secondary to what the film is actually about, because this movie is entirely about the enduring and triumphant nature of maternal love. The story covers 13 years about a college student named Hana who encounters and falls in a "fairy tale-like" love with a were-wolf. After marrying him, Hana gives birth and raises two wolf children: an older sister named Yuki and a younger brother named Ame. The story then follow Hana's struggles with this new maternal role (especially after the father's death) and how she deals with the difficulties it throws forward. Anyway, I was truly taken aback by the way this film was able to show me the struggles and perspectives of being a mother. I would like to point out that this is obvoiusly an exaggerated version of events, obviously because it is impossible to have wolf children (or is it??). Despite this the things The Wolf Children Ame and Yuki showed are true nevertheless.

Great piece of fanart showing the parents looking down on their journey: http://www.zerochan.net/1554658#full

First, this movie displayed the hardships a mother must go through and how she works hard for her children. Hana works hard everyday cooking and cleaning for her family, just as the father works hard to earn money for the family. This however becomes intensified after the father's death (during a search for food in his wolf form) as Hana must also manage what little finances the father left behind. Hana is of course the perfect character to face these struggles as her name reminds her fight through her trials and keep smiling. So although she spends long restless days and nights looking after her two overly demanding (because they are animals as well as being human) children. We see how this takes its tole on her as she goes about her daily chores in the beginning of the film. She must stay up all night to comfort her children if they are ill or sad, and she must be attentive in the day when they want to play and misbehave, not to mention she must cook, clean and balance the books. She must also make sure her children are behaving and take the blame from neighbours and fellow parents if her children are not. Being a mother is certainly a struggle. Just when she gets used to everything in her life new struggles are thrown forward: school and helping kids get adjusted to this, helping kids accpet themselves and their personalities, and helping them find their paths for later life. I will discuss these in more detail below. Furthermore, a mother must help her children stay safe and healthy. 

One can only imagine how many things Hana would have had to deal with whit such children: http://www.zerochan.net/1207354

Obviously this continues throughout the film, but is especially emphasised when she moves to her new house, which is really a symbolic and crucial part of the film in portraying this idea of struggle. To start with it shows how mothers must effectively give up their life for a totally new life. Hana's physical relocation represents the relocation of her responsibilities from study and part time work (trivial things compared to what she must do) to raise her offspring. Likewise the house she rents represents her family. It is rundown and in disrepair, just like family was after the father's death, especially financially. Just as Hana works hard to repair the roof and clean the place she is working hard to improve her family life and give her kids what they need. When she scrubs the sink hard enough she gets rid of the dirt and discovers the shining stones underneath, just as she works hard to improve her children she will discover the shining personalities they have. And although the hard she works on the house the more cuts she must cover up on her hands, the happier she is for her effort, the same with the effort she gives for her kids. At the same time as she cleans the floor and the wolf in the children (namely Yuki) dirties it with the frogs and bugs she finds, as Hana works to help her children the duality (usually the wolf part) of them will throw a spanner in the works and create more hardship. 

People visiting the house that became a symbol of Hana's maternal love: http://img.scoop.it/ammOiOHdfl_R79kvX6q1J4XXXL4j3HpexhjNOf_P3YmryPKwJ94QGRtDb3Sbc6KY

During her attempt to build a nice family life for her wolf children Hana, still stuck in her student ways, reads books on parenthood and gardening, in order to grow food for her family and save what little money they have in the process. However, Hana only succeeds in this venture when she seeks and receives help, namely from the grumpy yet concerned old man Nirasaki. For me the second piece of maternal life that was displayed in The Wolf Children Ame and Yuki is how difficult motherhood is, not only because of the hardwork it demands, but due to being a first time mother is something that women have never done before. This is of course sounds obvious but if is not really something we address in real life looking at our parents. Hana constantly admits her ignorance at being a mother, especially for two such challenging children. She knows she must teach them how to live but does not know how to teach them. Yet throughout her time in the city she must hid her children due to their duality, becuase she cannot risk revealing their wolf side for fear of the unknown, yet almost certainly disastrous, consequences. She cannot take them to the doctor or to the vet if they are sick and she cannot ask the government for help. One of the purposes of moving to the mountainside was to hide them from the public. Even when in her new place she tries to hide them from her new neighbours. Thus Hana attempts to hide her children and face all her hardships by herself. 

After the father's death Hana is left to raise the kids alone: http://daishota.deviantart.com/art/Ame-to-Yuki-409227062

However, the more she tries to bear the load by herself, the more difficult it becomes, exemplified by her garden situation. At the same time as hiding her kids however, she looks for help. She constantly wants to know how to raise her wolf children and looks for the answers in books and from the wolf at her new work. However, it is only when she seeks support from those around her does she find what she is looking for. She is able to grow more than enough crops and as she partakes more in the community the more they help her. Although Hana cannot ask someone about her problem directly (which I am sure she would love to do) or ask some family member for help but when she looks for support she finds it. The film shows how mothers are new at their job and may not feel as though they should look for support but they certainly should, because if they hide all their problems away it is very hard to get things right (and there are thigns you cannot learn from books). Although mothers       themselves are new at their job, there are others who are not new at it, and they must be looked to for help and advice. Hana even realises this after the community support her.

Although advice really helped Hana, the children could not show their wolf forms: http://fc08.deviantart.net/fs70/i/2013/114/b/7/wolf_children_yuki_and_ame_grown_up_by_kibawolfheart-d62gatb.png

This then leads to the next part of The Wolf Children, which shows what a mother's true job is. As mentioned above (briefly) Hana's struggles to be a mother includes helping her children to love themselves and who they are. In particular she must help Yuki, who was more inclined to be a wolf, to love herself as a human and help Ame, who perfers to stay in his human form, to accept and embrace the wolf side of himself. For Yuki this is particularly established in her desire to go to school and be like a normal kid, despite the fact she is anything but normal and is all too easily excited and quick to transform into a wolf. Hana helps Yuki with this though by making her a nice dress and by giving her a "magic spell" (more of a calming mantra) to say in order to stop her transforming. Both of these work as Yuki loves her new life at school as a human and from then one wants to be a human. Likewise (yet in total contrast, Ame dislikes his wolf form and struggles with it. This stems from the fact that he is untalented at hunting (sort of like a test for true wolves I guess) and that when he read a book about wolves they are hated by people. Hana must convince him to accept and love that he is part wolf. She says how she loved his father and his wolf side and that not everyone hates them. She also brings himto her new work to communicate with the encaged wolf and help Ame embrace the other side of himself. This again works and we see that Ame learns to love this part of himself and often wanders off into the mountainous woods as a wolf. 

Hana had to get each child to love a different part of themselves, which they did to an extend of role-reversal: http://www.zerochan.net/1515631

Hana does such a great job, in fact, of getting her kids to accept and embrace those parts of themselves that they did not originally like, that there is an almost total role reversal. Ame is now more inclined to the ways of the wolf, whereas Yuki prefers her human state. This all leads to conflict within the family and the next task of Hana as the exemplary mother emerges from this. The two fight between the two children is about which path is the right one to choose, with Yuki saying Ame should come to school more often as he wasting his time as a wolf, but Ame voices the opinion that Yuki is just hiding he true self, the wolf part, and that she needs to let go. This fight gets physical as both turn to wolves and set upon each other. Ame, who has obviously spent much more time as a wolf, easily has Yuki on the ropes quickly and chases her into the bathroom. Hana thus must pick up the piece and assert that anyway in life that they choose is the right way. In fact, Hana realises early on that as a mother she must not only help her kids accept themselves but let them choose their own paths. One key reason she moved to the country side was to allow the children to choose their lifestyle. She even tells them they must make this decision soon after they move to the mountains. 

Hana must get the children to choose the life of the wolf or the human life: http://farooky.deviantart.com/art/The-Wolf-Children-Ame-and-Yuki-301936177

It is one thing to let someone choose their own path, it is another to support them fully and let go of what control you have over them. Hana then does the best she can to support Yuki's life and when Yuki does not want to go back to school Hana helps push her back on the horse per say after she turns into a wolf and scratches Souhei. She also helps Yuki reconcile with Souhei. Hana likewise continues to support Ame in his decision to be more wolf like and is impressed with how he has found a mentor in the old fox who is the guardian of the forest. However, Hana starts to rethink and resist this decision when this means that Ame is put in danger, as he must help his mentor do dangerous tasks (like help out during the heavy storm) and because it means she might lose him because he will take up residence in the woods as his mentor's replacement. Ame goes against his mother's wishes and during the storm goes into the forest, instead of travelling with his mother to pick up Yuki from school. In an attempt to guard and protect Ame, Hana follows him but this all proves futile when treking through the dangerous woods, she slips and is left semi-unconsious. Ame rescues her and only then does she realise she must let go and let him take up the place in the world that he desires to occupy, only wishing that she could have done more for him. However, after she makes this decision she feels happiness, seeing him howl in the sunlight, realising she has done all she can. It seems as if Hana learns and grows from this experience. At the end of the film we learn Yuki goes off to boarding school. This time there is no fight from her mother, there is only support. Hana has learnt that she cannot change the past and that the only other thing she can do for her children is to let them go on, without her by their side, following their dreams. It is alright to guard them from dangers but too much becomes more restriction than safety. This it seems is the hardest part of motherhood, letting go of those babies you raised into the world, with the feeling that you could do more to help. 

The snow day was when Ame grew to love his wolf side and embrace it fully: http://yamiik.deviantart.com/art/Live-your-life-Ame-358394731

Although Ame creates the main problem in the film and for mothers (namely Hana), Yuki is not unimportant even if we are talking about maternal love. It is during Hana's biggest task that Yuki is able to communicate with Souhei, the boy whom she avoided, attacked and then began to like. He lets us into a bad example of a mother's love, as illustrated by his mother. He tells of how his mother is ignoring and basically abandoning him because she will marry a richer man and is pregnant with his baby. This of course is the complete opposite of Hana, the good mother, who abandons all her desires for (or rather transforms them to become one with) the needs of her children. Souhei's mother abandons her child, who says he will become a boxer to survive. I think it is important, not that we see this happening, but hear it from the victim Souhei, the forgotten son, so that we can get a better perspective of the pain and hardship it causes if a mother neglects her maternal duty for her own desires. Souhei's mother was already shown as nasty when scolding Yuki and Hana but now she comes across as downright despicable. We reflect on Hana's struggles and think of how great a mother she really is. 

Souhei tells Yuki of his despicable mother: http://www.zerochan.net/1554661

There is one last observation that can be made about mothers from this film and that is a mother's perspective of what the worse thing in the world is. This is that they would lose their child, ie their child would die. This is addressed when Ame, starting to accept his wolf side, tries to catch a bird s he has never been that good at hunting, especially when compared to his sister, and now that his mum has vitalised his spirit he feels the need to prove himself. He suceeds, however, in the process he falls into a stream. Although Yuki is able to save him from the rushing waters, because it is winter with snow on the ground, the cold really affects him and we can see the fear in Hana's face. They are able to help him recover, partly (I assume) because he is part wolf but we learn from Yuki's narration afterwards this was her mother's scariest moment. More than anything else Hana feared losing her baby. I think that this is why, later in the film, letting go for Hana, and I guess mothers in general, is such a struggle. When your greatest fear is losing the one you love and you must let them go with no control of their outcomes it can be a daunting prospect, however it is, as we have seen, the best thing to do.

Although they are happy now, Hana's scariest moment was almost losing Ame to the cold: http://www.zerochan.net/1666884

The closing theme nicely summises all the issues within the film. It mentions danger, responsibility, looking after kids, loving their inner personalities, their symbotic relationship for happiness, and most importantly how mothers must let go eventually. Although the film is named after the children this film is truly about their mother and what it takes to be a mother. Sure the wolf children are extreme and obviously imaginary examples, but the idea of motherhood being a struggle is true nevertheless. This film not only is an amusing and interesting but it also makes me thankful for my mother due to the way it presents Hana and her trials as the mother of two wolf children. Often it is hard to see these things when you are in the middle of the mother-child dynamic so it is great to see a film that allows the audience to view our own relationship through a third party perspective and become better for it. It is easy for us to forget things like how difficult motherhood is and how this is a new experience for women who are expected to be perfect right off the bat. A film that can convey such a message and give an enjoyable story at the same time is definitely worth a watch.